On 25 Jun 2025, at 23:39, Tristan Matthews via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
> On Monday, June 16th, 2025 at 2:22 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt
> <andreas.rheinha...@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> Tristan Matthews via ffmpeg-devel:
>
> On Monday, June 16th, 2025 at 6:53 AM, Andreas Rheinhardt
> andreas.rheinha...@outlook.com wrote:
>
> Patch attached.
>
> LGTM, and sorry about that, for future reference did you do anything in
> particular (instrumentation wise) to catch the stack overflow? I tried make
> fate on a few different machines and didn't hit that.
>
> Best,
> Tristan
>
>
> I used (Clang) ASAN. Presumably Zhao Zhili (who first reported the stack
> buffer overflow) did so, too.
>
> - Andreas
>
>
> It'd be good to merge either this or Zhao Zhili's patch to get checkasm back
> to being ASAN clean.
>
> Best,
> Tristan
If there are no objections, I would like to merge this patch soon.
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
