Niklas Haas:
> From: Niklas Haas <g...@haasn.dev>
>
> This will serve as a reference for the SIMD backends to come. That said,
> with auto-vectorization enabled, the performance of this is not atrocious.
> It easily beats the old C code and sometimes even the old SIMD.
>
> In theory, we can dramatically speed it up by using GCC vectors instead of
> arrays, but the performance gains from this are too dependent on exact GCC
> versions and flags, so it practice it's not a substitute for a SIMD
> implementation.
> ---
> diff --git a/libswscale/ops.c b/libswscale/ops.c
> index c4f03531eb..2d8f9e6084 100644
> --- a/libswscale/ops.c
> +++ b/libswscale/ops.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,10 @@
> #include "ops.h"
> #include "ops_internal.h"
>
> +extern SwsOpBackend backend_c;
Why are this and the other backends not const?
> +
> const SwsOpBackend * const ff_sws_op_backends[] = {
> + &backend_c,
> NULL
> };
>
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
