On Sun, 13 Jul 2025 13:43:57 +0200 Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> Hi all > > Do people want Forgejo or Gitlab on code.ffmpeg.org for testing? > > F. code.ffmpeg.org should run Forgejo > G. code.ffmpeg.org should run Gitlab > > all GA members can vote, by publically replying here with a > "F." / "Forgejo" vs "G." / "Gitlab" > End time is in 7 days unless teh community wants to extend that. > (or do people want a formal vote to be setup? on vote.ffmpeg.org) > > After we decide what to run on code.ffmpeg.org, I intend to > * apply the CI patches which timo currently keeps rebasing on the > Forgejo git (maybe timo can post these to ffmpeg-devel) > > * extend my github cronjob to autosync Forgejo or Gitlab too > (or someone else can set one up) > > * announce code.ffmpeg.org publically so people can start submitting > and reviewing on it as an alternative to the ML > > * and a month or 2 after that we can re-asses how many people use > code.ffmpeg.org and how many use the ML. Then we could decide to keep > using both in parallel or switch back to ML or just use > code.ffmpeg.org. Or in fact we could switch between Gitlab or Forgejo > here still as well. > > thx > F. I do not actually have a strong opinion, but I know Timo already got Forgejo set up, and so we should take advantage of that. --phil _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
