> On Wednesday, September 2, 2015 5:43 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceho...@ag.or.at>
> wrote:
> I didn't test because it works fine afaict.
Great
>> Or are you offering a suggestion for mixed 24fps
>> progressive and 24->30 telecined?
>
> Yes.
>
>> In that case it seems like this should work.
>
> This is what my tests showed.
> (But I don't have a long sample.)
>
>> You are using dejudder & fps to produce a stream of
>> frames lies ABCDDEFGHH... then decimate drops the
>> dups. Seems brutal.
>
> Why / how?
It just seems strange to me to make those extra frames just to throw them away.
Seems mean to the frames I guess. But, if it works..
>> Is there a reason why this filter chain is preferable >> to
>> pullup,dejudder? (perhaps with fps) or is this
>> just another option?
>
> pullup is a faster alternative that may not produce
> perfect output, I don't think it works (or can be used)
> with the fps filter (that I consider being broken or at
> least showing unexpected behaviour.
> > Carl Eugen
Ok, good to know. Glad to see anyone besides me is using dejudder.
-Nick
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel