On 7/26/2025 9:29 PM, Kacper Michajlow wrote: > I agree. But like mentioned in the previous message, I don't think > giving more time changes this in practice. It will likely just move > the "pain point" to a different date. Because at some point there will > be "the date".
+1 > Of course this hinges on the fact we will actually use forgejo, it > would be unreasonable to force people to move and then say we are > going back to ML or something. A test period is required, so the > decision can be made. This announcement should not be made at all if this is not a decisive change, IMO. - Derek _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
