On Tue, 14 Apr 2026, 02:11 Kieran Kunhya, <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 14 Apr 2026, 01:51 James Almer via ffmpeg-devel, < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On 4/13/2026 9:08 PM, Betchkal, Davyd via ffmpeg-devel wrote: >> > Thank you for the responses. It is correct to assume the NPS uses your >> Windows executable (although I use ffmpeg with Linux at home). >> > Incidentally we are also restricted from using the Windows Store. So, >> to be clear, adding a digital signature is not something that the ffmpeg >> developer community can or will support? A definitive answer would be >> helpful going forward. >> >> It is something we could support, but as far as I'm aware, the certs >> required to sign Windows binaries are not cheap. Sponsoring to cover the >> cost would however solve that. >> > > Maybe FFmpeg could self-sign? > > When getting a commercial digital signature, I believe there's some form > of identity verification involved. FFmpeg of course does not have a legal > entity to verify. > > Kieran > There is apparently a way we could do this: https://signpath.org Kieran > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
