On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 08:29:32PM +0200, Christophe Gisquet wrote: > 2015-09-28 11:21 GMT+02:00 Christophe Gisquet <christophe.gisq...@gmail.com>: > > Please ignore for now. > > The specs explicitly says it is the same for luma and chroma. Here's a > patch that confidently reflects that. > > -- > Christophe
> dnxhddata.c | 13 +------------ > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-) > 5384571f8a8554e84b3eb12b6c2c32b2043bd4b6 > 0001-dnxhddata-deduplicate-table.patch > From bfbb0bdde4eee8d44d9c158e04b50fb4177c428f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Christophe Gisquet <christophe.gisq...@gmail.com> > Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 17:30:55 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH 1/9] dnxhddata: deduplicate table > > CID 1256 is specified as using the same table for luma and chroma, > which is the same as CID 1235 luma table. This is consistent with > the format supposedly being RGB, although most sequences seem to > actually be YCbCr-encoded. > --- > libavcodec/dnxhddata.c | 13 +------------ > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-) applied thanks [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB It is what and why we do it that matters, not just one of them.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
