On Sat, 24 Oct 2015 19:30:26 -0400 "Ronald S. Bultje" <rsbul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc > > wrote: > > > either way, this subject is rather uninterresting ill try to do > > something more usefull for FFmpeg than arguing about these > > hypothetical cases ... > > > +100. > > Many of these tools are like -Wpedantic. Reminds me of my rants about > helgrind. I still don't think expecting the compiler to treat all memory accesses as volatile and/or weak atomic accesses is going to work out. Concurrency is hard, let's not make it harder? _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
