On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanaga...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> The rationale for this function is reflected in the documentation for
>> it, and is copied here:
>>
>> Clip a double value into the long long amin-amax range.
>> This function is needed because conversion of floating point to integers
>> when
>> it does not fit in the integer's representation does not necessarily
>> saturate
>> correctly (usually converted to a cvttsd2si on x86) which saturates
>> numbers
>> > INT64_MAX to INT64_MIN. The standard marks such conversions as undefined
>> behavior, allowing this sort of mathematically bogus conversions. This
>> provides
>> a safe alternative that is slower obviously but assures safety and better
>> mathematical behavior.
>> @param a value to clip
>> @param amin minimum value of the clip range
>> @param amax maximum value of the clip range
>> @return clipped value
>>
>> Note that a priori if one can guarantee from the calling side that the
>> double is in range, it is safe to simply do an explicit/implicit cast,
>> and that will be far faster. However, otherwise, this function should be
>> used.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> As a general remark, Clang/GCC has a -Wfloat-conversion so that at least
>> implicit conversions can be found. This helped me in auditing the
>> codebase. In order to reduce noise while testing, an explicit cast on the
>> return
>> was placed. I can remove it if people prefer, though I like the cast as
>> it makes the intent of possible narrowing explicit.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanaga...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  libavutil/common.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/libavutil/common.h b/libavutil/common.h
>> index 6f0f582..e778dd2 100644
>> --- a/libavutil/common.h
>> +++ b/libavutil/common.h
>> @@ -298,6 +298,34 @@ static av_always_inline av_const double
>> av_clipd_c(double a, double amin, double
>>      else               return a;
>>  }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * Clip a double value into the long long amin-amax range.
>> + * This function is needed because conversion of floating point to
>> integers when
>> + * it does not fit in the integer's representation does not necessarily
>> saturate
>> + * correctly (usually converted to a cvttsd2si on x86) which saturates
>> numbers
>> + * > INT64_MAX to INT64_MIN. The standard marks such conversions as
>> undefined
>> + * behavior, allowing this sort of mathematically bogus conversions. This
>> provides
>> + * a safe alternative that is slower obviously but assures safety and
>> better
>> + * mathematical behavior.
>> + * @param a value to clip
>> + * @param amin minimum value of the clip range
>> + * @param amax maximum value of the clip range
>> + * @return clipped value
>> + */
>> +static av_always_inline av_const int64_t av_clipd64_c(double a, int64_t
>> amin, int64_t amax)
>> +{
>> +#if defined(HAVE_AV_CONFIG_H) && defined(ASSERT_LEVEL) && ASSERT_LEVEL >=
>> 2
>> +    if (amin > amax) abort();
>> +#endif
>> +    // INT64_MAX+1,INT64_MIN are exactly representable as IEEE doubles
>> +    if (a >= 9223372036854775808.0)
>> +        return INT64_MAX;
>> +    if (a <= INT64_MIN)
>> +        return INT64_MIN;
>> +    // Finally safe to call av_clipd_c
>> +    return (int64_t)av_clipd_c(a, amin, amax);
>> +}
>
>
> Is this different from llrint?

Very much so, man llrint:
"If  x is a NaN or an infinity, or the rounded value is too large to
be stored in a long (long long in the case of the ll* functions), then
a domain error occurs, and the return value is unspecified."

If you are curious, just do an llrint on e.g INT64_MAX + 100, I am
pretty sure you won't be pleased with the result :).

This is exactly the motivation of the patch - it provides a safe, sane
way to get a float to an integer range when it may not fit.

>
> Ronald
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to