On Fri, 06 Nov 2015 18:00:35 +0100 Sebastien Alaiwan <sebastien.alai...@allegrodvt.com> wrote:
> On 11/06/2015 05:37 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Sebastien Alaiwan < > > sebastien.alai...@allegrodvt.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> The attached patch fixes an issue with the superframe index parsing. > >> Please find attached a VP9 IVF stream showing the issue (if you try to > >> remux it to webm). > >> The gist of the problem is that the vp9 superframe parser seems to expect > >> at least two frames inside the superframe. > > > > This is not OK, you rewrote the full parser and it looks like you simply > > copied the libvpx code. > I did not. I simplified the flow of control of the existing code. > Would it be a problem anyway? > > A simple fix and extensive refactoring should at least be in separate patches. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
