Hi, On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 12:46 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanaga...@gmail.com > wrote:
> I personally consider this net ~ 10x and overall perf numbers sufficient > for using dynamic initialization all the time here, especially since the > tables are large. This is a logical fallacy. By this logic, I could post some really shitty code, speed it up 10x and then say "I made it better so it should be default", regardless of what the actual quality of the current code is. If you want to argue for dynamic vs. static table default choice, you should compare only these two currents (dynamic vs static), not the improvement of an old dynamic vs current dynamic table generation. (I have no opinion on which default should be chosen, although >1M post-patch cycles seems like enough of a reason for me to say that static tables serves a real use case, particularly on slower devices.) Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
