On 12/16/2015 07:52 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 12/16/2015 07:45 PM, Lou Logan wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 19:18:33 +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:

If you can create a proper patchset out of the archive, you can remove
that single line.

That will not happen.

It's unnecessary for me to upload a new archive with such a small
change. It's a whole new file, at that.

Another reason nobody is looking at your patch(es) is that it has been
compressed; adding another step reviewers must take to accommodate your
non-standard methods of patch submission. Most people review via their
mail client, and if there is a patch that takes more effort than
usually required then it is more likely to be ignored because there are
always other patches to review and test.

I looked at the contents of your archive and it contains four .diff
files and a single .c file. This is not possible to review or apply.
Please use git to make a proper patch as requested previously.

See:
<http://www.ffmpeg.org/developer.html#Submitting-patches>
<http://www.ffmpeg.org/git-howto.html>
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Haha... OK then. I've done what I can. Take it or leave it.

Mats

I have said before that I'm not going to dwell into the complexities of Git, since it feels about as wasteful as programming a GUI in my book. If you can't accept the patches in their current format, so be it. Thanks for your time and understanding.

Mats

--
Mats Peterson
http://matsp888.no-ip.org/~mats/
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to