Hi, On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Reverting big commits to fix one sample and making future merges > harder or impossible seems not like the best option, unless it can be > shown that the entire change is flawed, and not just a small bug. > Otherwise, it should be attempted to fix regressions the usual way - > by fixing things, not reverting. So, it seems (from a cursory look) that the change basically removed the possibility to introduce a "default" ref (from the pps) if the actual ref (from the slicehdr) is missing (e.g. dropped frames or so). I'm not sure why we specifically want a default ref here, why not just take the one with the nearest poc value instead? (That's what openhevc's code does.) Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel