Hi,

On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajja...@mit.edu>
wrote:

> Also, over time I would like to cleanup the avutil/libm header: there
> are macros in places where there should really be functions, though
> Hendrik points out that in some cases there is no real alternative. At
> the moment, most of the macros are used without any justification in
> the patch notes or as comments.


I think it's not too far off to say that development of libm.h is largely
organic, that is, it's done based on needs and breakages until we have
something that fills our needs, but nothing that was designed beyond just
that. So, sure, if you can design it better, that would be very welcome.

Ronald
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to