On 1/3/2016 5:33 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote: > + return (0x6996966996696996ULL >> (x & 63) ^ (x>>7) ^ (x>>6)) & 1;
I mean, I see how it works, but it's incredibly non-obvious without the patch context (table removal). - Derek _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
