On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajja...@mit.edu> wrote: [...] >> For now, I definitely think we should replace our decoder. >> Just a clarification: in the long run, isn't it a good idea to get >> this into the repo and not use an external library? For instance, if >> and when asm code gets written for this, isn't it easier to work >> within FFmpeg's codebase, which has some infrastructure for writing >> asm? >> > > The whole idea of this patch is to integrate the decoder fully into > our codebase, and no longer use the external library.
I see, sorry for the confusion and noise. [...] _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel