On 1/5/2016 11:51 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 11:44:04PM -0300, James Almer wrote: >> On 1/5/2016 11:35 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 11:27:25PM -0300, James Almer wrote: >>>> On 1/5/2016 11:21 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > [...] >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Ideally, once this decoder is committed replacing the current one we'd >>>> replace >>>> the samples for the set available here: >>>> https://github.com/foo86/dcadec-samples >>> >>> we can add new fate samples, we cannot replace fate samples >>> replacing would break previous checkouts and releases >>> not sure you actually meant to replace any ... >> >> Yeah, forgot about that. Kinda makes for a bloated fate suit in the long >> run... > > this wouldnt happen if reference files where properly generated > that is with some reference decoder or taken from the input to a > reference encoder or from some referece test suite. > > for subtitles or other where files are tiny that is a non issue though > ...
Well, whoever made the xll test knew it would probably become obsolete at some point, since the decoder was not bitexact when the pcm reference was created. At least i assume that's why the test fails with this new bitexact decoder. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
