On 16-02-04 at 15:48, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
[..]
> This will essentially help bring the project to near 21st century age
> and finally allow for developers to save on line numbers by NOT having
> to define the variable around which a for loop needs to iterate (e.g.
> have for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) loops instead of having to define 'i'
> at the start of the function like a normal variable), as well as more of
> the syntactic sugar C99 permits.
Just being pedantic, but -Wdeclaration-after-statement does not warn on
any of those, see attached test file which compiles without errors with
-Wall -Wpedantic -Werror -Wdeclaration-after-statement (at least on
modern clang and gcc). No comment on the actual change.
--
Simon Thelen
int main()
{
int a = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
int j = 5;
a += j + i;
}
if (a != 0) {
int b = 5;
b--;
}
return 0;
}
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
