>>> Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> schrieb am Di, 16.2.2016:On 2/8/16, Thomas >>> Mundt <loudmax-at-yahoo...@ffmpeg.org> wrote: >>>>> Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> schrieb am Mo, 8.2.2016: >>> How does the speed compare to YADIF? >>> Or in other words, is it usable in real-time, or rather designed for >>> offline processing? >>> >> YADIF is quicker, because of its CPU optimizations. Without CPU >> optimizations BobWeaver is quicker. >> It should definitely be usable in real-time. > > Could you provide samples when this filters gives better output than > yadif/w3fdif ?
Shure. Is there an intended place where I can upload them or is it free choice? Please note that the output is not better than yadif AND w3dif. But it will look like yadif when yadif is better than w3fdif and look like w3fdif when w3fdif is better than yadif. I´m at work atm, but will upload the samples tonight. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
