Hi, On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceho...@ag.or.at> wrote:
> Hi! > > As requested on ffmpeg-user. I'm a little ambivalent to this. Let me explain. You can easily fix this with a shell script that creates links from img-{1000...1}.jpg to img_2_{1...1000}.jpg and deletes them after the ffmpeg run. This is super-trivial. The problem I have with this is that we're slowly, and very very hackishly, extending the sequential image support without addressing its fundamental weakness as a non-unix tool: it doesn't use shell expansion. I'd want to use ffmpeg -i img-*.jpg so it skips non-existing frames, or use other unix tools to rev the order or whatever, shell syntax is great for this but ffmpeg.exe does not support any of that. So why hack in this one silly thing if we don't address the fundamental problem instead, which would also fix this? Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel