Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenhuis <at> gmail.com> writes: > On 2/26/2016 3:05 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > Or in other words: Except for jpeg, there is no > > probe function that returns 0 although the decoder > > can decode the image. > > I'll take your word for it on this part.
Please don't: Instead double-check on what I had written in my previous mail. > > So please provide your failing jpeg cases to > > improve the probing. > > I will probably look myself into the issue but I > > prefer to have samples to test. I fixed the remaining issue I saw, I'd be happy to fix more remaining test cases. > Is it perhaps preferable to share a JPEG parser? Sorry, I don't understand this. > I think these sorts of failures will continue to pop > up as long as the JPEG probing is an ad-hoc parser. I believe that auto-detection works fine now for images that comply with the spec but see above. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel