On 20 May 2016 at 11:37, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > as one testing ffmpeg with openh264 (building at least) > > i have mixed feelings about this, it would cause me to drop further > testing with openh264 in all releases OR in git master > because releases wont build with git master of openh264 and > master wont build with older openh264 > having 2 different versions installed would be possible but i will not > go to that troubble and i suspect noone else will either
I see very few distros actually packaging OpenH264 (it's mainly only used by Firefox, but there's a GStreamer plugin for it too, I think), but when they do it's either 1.5 (Archlinux AUR) or 1.5.3 (Fedora 23-25). Not using Cisco's binaries voids the patent protection, so I guess that's why they don't package it. Depends on whether FFmpeg cares about supporting non-releases. If it doesn't it should probably be noted somewhere, at least in the wiki. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
