On 08/09/16 15:17, Andy Furniss wrote:
Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
2016-09-08 12:01 GMT+02:00 Andy Furniss <adf.li...@gmail.com>:
I don't know what it is about x11grab/CSC with ffmpeg, but
on my old CPU gstreamer is twice as fast.
x11grab or xcb?
I guess xcb as I don't --enable anything related with configure.
In case it got mistaken...
The following is what gives the 100 fp/s (with a GTX 960):
$ ffmpeg -f x11grab -framerate 200 -s hd1080 -i :0.0 -c:v hevc_nvenc -y test.mkv
The mentioned 100 fp/s refers to the HEVS/H.265 hardware encoder (nvenc).
X11grab is here only the input device.
Without the encoder does it give me 160 fp/s:
$ ffmpeg -f x11grab -s hd1080 -framerate 500 -i :0.0 -f null -
Different sizes then give different results:
- For hd720 is it 200 fp/s (with nvenc) and 420 fp/s (without nvenc).
- For hd480 is it 460 fp/s (with nvenc) and 890 fp/s (without nvenc).
Can you compare gstreamer to those numbers?
Is anyone also capable of running this in a true 4K display with a Pascal card?
There the speed matters the most.
Sven
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
