On Wednesday, September 14, 2016, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> 2016-09-14 16:42 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com <javascript:;>>:
> > Adopted from 4eb49fdde8f84d54a763cfb5d355527b525ee2bf revert.
>
> I am of course not against this patch but wasn't the reason for the
> old code in utils.c that our h264 parser has insufficiencies?
>

Like what? Only h264 have those fields. Doing it outside of parser seems
strange.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to