On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 02:01:17PM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > 2016-09-19 14:00 GMT+02:00 Clément Bœsch <u...@pkh.me>: > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:37:10PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote: > >> On 9/19/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceho...@ag.or.at> wrote: > >> > Hi! > >> > > >> > Attached patch fixes the aspect ratio for the sample from > >> > ticket #5325 / #2125. > >> > > >> > The fate test changes because the fate sample was written > >> > by FFmpeg with an incorrect aspect ratio. > >> > > >> > Please comment, Carl Eugen > >> > > >> > >> > From 0553b0adfee87401854f0313dbcf386f2fb7ae68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >> > From: Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceho...@ag.or.at> > >> > Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 13:30:06 +0200 > >> > Subject: [PATCH] lavf/mov: Read aspect ratio from ares atom for dnxhd. > >> > > >> > Fixes ticket #2125. > >> > Fixes ticket #5325. > >> > >> Feel free to spread lies to logs, it that helps your ego. > > > > Please don't use such aggressive statements. It might just be a ticket > > number error here. > > Why do you believe that there is an error? >
Because I'm assuming you made a mistake some way or another. It does look like wording instead of ticket number. > > From the code of conduct: "Do not assume malice for things that can be > > attributed to incompetence. Even if it is malice, it’s rarely good to > > start with that as initial assumption." > > I thought this is not relevant anymore? > Why do you believe that? -- Clément B. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel