On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 00:21:42 +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > In any case, your second patch is acceptable, should not have > any adversary effects and we have significantly worse cosmetic > patches in our tree, so it is ok imo.
I only see one patch - did I miss one? - , and if that's the one you're referring to, it should at least be created with git format-patch (and thus include a proper commit message). Moritz _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
