On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 4:15 AM, Kieran Kunhya <kier...@obe.tv> wrote: > > Getting patches merged by sheer attrition is a shameful way of "running" an > open source project.
I think ignoring follow-up questions from the patch submitter, like you are doing with mine, it's plain rude. Basically your position is "SCTE-35 doesn't fit into ffmpeg's model therefore it cannot be supported, ever, and the industry professionals that want SCTE-35 just need to find a different program". Did I sum it up correctly? Really, if there's a problem with my implementation -totally possible- I'm more than happy to discuss and iterate. And of course I won't take offense if you send a patch over it or a total rewrite that is better than mine. But whining about the fact that my patch has been -partially- merged even though you wanted to veto it "just because" it's childish. Carlos _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
