On date Monday 2016-10-31 11:27:17 -0300, James Almer encoded: > On 10/31/2016 11:20 AM, Nicolas George wrote: > > Le decadi 10 brumaire, an CCXXV, Jean-Baptiste Kempf a écrit : > >> I strongly disagree with this patch too. > > > > We do not care about the number of people who disagree, we only care > > about practical arguments. > > That's a curious thing to say when we have a voting committee to > deal with polarizing subjects that went beyond practical arguments.
So, in practical terms, do you want me to start a formal vote about the inclusion of the format? I remember that in the last version the format is disabled by default (if people prefer I can add a dependency on an --enable-unsafe configure switch). I'm still convinced it could be useful for some testing scenarios and for data injection, but I'll commit to the decision of the voting committee in case it is rejected. -- FFmpeg = Frightening & Fancy Marvellous Picky Extroverse Ghost _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
