On 10/31/2016 1:27 PM, Nicolas George wrote: > Le decadi 10 brumaire, an CCXXV, wm4 a écrit : >> I don't have the energy for such long-winded technological discussions >> which (predictably) lead to nothing. I just want my disagreement noted. > > Well, you noted it, and I personally do not care at all without > arguments. > >> If we have Reviewed-by etc. headers, why not Nacked-by ones? > > Because each commit would require approximately seven billion Nacked-by > entries.
So you're saying no matter how many people veto a patch it means shit and they will be committed anyway because the writer of the patch and one other person want to? One author, one positive review and seven billion Nack means the commit is approved? > > Regards, > > > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
