On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > Le quartidi 24 brumaire, an CCXXV, Clement Boesch a écrit : >> I'm OK to make an exception for filter links that way if it's really >> important for you, but I don't think that's a good way of dealing with the >> problem in the rest of the codebase. > > Why? The arguments I gave for AVFilterLink apply to a lot of similar > structures. It would make the actual code in a lot of places simpler. >
If anything this discussion has shown that there are quite different priorities for many different developers. A key priority for many of us here seems to be to have a clean separation in public and private fields and keeping the public API clean and respectable (no weird ifdeffery in public headers, for example). We've had such a messy API for such a long time, so if we define any new solutions for the future, it should be one we can all be happy with. You seem to prefer a bit more internal simplicity over external interfaces, which is fine, but you should not expect everyone to share that preference. - Hendrik _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
