On 16.11.2016 15:14, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 01:48:05PM +0100, wm4 wrote: >> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:21:34 +0100 >> Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 09:56:16PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >>>> However, considering the sheer amount of crashes in libschroedinger and >>>> that it's apparently not maintained anymore, it might be better to >>>> simply remove this decoder. >>> >>> id say decoders which crash should be marked as >>> AV_CODEC_CAP_EXPERIMENTAL >> >> Experimental implies it's early work in progress which will stabilize >> later. >> >> libschroedinger is completely dead, and it's entirely possible that >> you're the person who cares most about it on this planet. >> > >> Should we introduce a AV_CODEC_CAP_TRASH flag? > > i dont know, but i am not against a flag marking decoders with > security issues or unmaintained code. > i think we should use a different term than "trash", we should not > call other peoples code anything offensive or insulting.
Maybe AV_CODEC_CAP_DEPRECATED? But I'm not sure if adding this for just one decoder makes much sense. Best regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
