On 11/28/2016 1:03 PM, Nicolas George wrote: > L'octidi 8 frimaire, an CCXXV, James Almer a écrit : >> How about the news entry on the website stating ffserver was meant to >> go with 3.2? And the discussions that lead to it? That's a good rational >> argument. > > # November 29th, 2016, ffserver not removed > # > # Thanks to the efforts of dedicated developers, ffserver has been > # updated and no longer needs to be removed immediately. > > That's taken care of. And I assure you, ffserver users will prefer a > change of mind like that than a follow-through.
You could also add # November 29th, 2016, From now on, announcements from this project are # worth as much as a copy of ET for the Atari. # # Thanks to the efforts of people that couldn't get over the fact they # showed up late and that abused the goodwill of some developers, nothing # you read announced here from now on is to be trusted. > >> If you meant technical arguments, the time for those was months ago. > > The time for technical arguments is always. For things up to debate, sure. This is not the case. > >> If there's a vote, it will be to choose between ffserver being removed >> tomorrow, or right before 3.3 is branched. >> There's no "ffserver stays" option. That possibility was lost months >> ago when neither you or anyone else showed up to back it up. > > Hail James, our Great Dictator who decides what we are allowed to vote > about. No, those are the only options within the boundaries already established. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel