Hi,

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 2016-12-05 15:23 GMT+01:00 James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com>:
> > The technical reasons are there, described in the news entry you seem to
> > not want to read, or at least properly parse.
> > These past week however saw one developer working against the clock doing
> > what the actual people interested in ffserver should have done for the
> past
> > few months and even years. That is, he addressed most, but not all, of
> those
> > and other reasons.
>
> Which reasons were not adressed?


ffm is a pretty important one?

Ronald
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to