2016-12-10 13:33 GMT+01:00 Marton Balint <c...@passwd.hu>: > > On Sat, 10 Dec 2016, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > >> 2016-12-09 20:33 GMT+01:00 Marton Balint <c...@passwd.hu>: >>> >>> If we still want a default limit, that limit should be IMHO >>> _insanely_ high, tens of thousands, not hundreds. >> >> Do you have a file that has hundreds of streams? > > No I don't, but that does not mean that nobody has such a file, > and we should not support it by default. Also I mentioned that > corrupted sources can generate dummy streams.
I thought that I am normally on the user's (and broken stream's) side (and I believe that 16k is not so unusual) but 100 streams seem already unrealistic to me, 1000 even more so. >> Note that I suggested 1000 as limit. > > Even 1000 does not seems so unthinkable to me, so I > suggested tens of thousands. Then we can leave the option at INT_MAX imo. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel