Hi, On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2016-12-10 23:59 GMT+01:00 James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com>: > > >>> Again, I'm against this. This is not news entry worthy. > >> > >> Then please revert the configure change: > >> This is (by far) the biggest change in configure behaviour since > forever, > >> this has to be communicated and this was the condition for the patch. > > > > I don't think reverting an (allegedly wanted and beneficial) change just > > What does "wanted" mean in this context? > > The change was reviewed and it was ok with a Changelog and a news > entry. The patch was applied, so please add the news entry. > > > because you wont accept it unless it has its own news entry makes sense > > or is even fair to the person that wrote it and submitted it. > > > >> > >>> A line can be added to the next release news entry announcement, or > >>> to the RELEASE_NOTES files, but not alone. > >> > >> If you care, add it to the release notes, but this cannot replace the > >> news entry. > > > > The RELEASE_NOTES mention is the only thing that's a must for this, > > aside from the Changelog entry. > > I disagree but please feel free to add this to release notes if you want. > > The news entry is needed for this change. ... according to you... Right? Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel