Hi, On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:48 AM, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 08:17:08 -0500 > "Ronald S. Bultje" <rsbul...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 7:15 AM, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > /** > > > * Not to be accessed directly from outside libavutil > > > */ > > > AVBufferRef *qp_table_buf; > > > > > > The comment should be adjusted and allow direct access. Also, > > > it should be moved out of the FF_API_FRAME_QP ifdef (why was > > > it under it anyway). > > > > > > I disagree. FF_API_FRAME_QP is not something that exists or is useful > > outside a handful of codecs (basically mpeg-1/2/4). If we want this to be > > public API, it should exist in a way that makes it useful to the majority > > of codecs that use quantization. I'm speaking codecs not developed by > > people that implemented qp_table_buf, for example vp3/5/6/8/9 etc. > > > > This also means we need a useful way to normalization the quantizer to a > > universal scale. Exporting it as SCALE_MPEG, SCALE_H264 etc. is not > useful. > > We need a universal Q so -sameq has some kind of meaning when re-encoding > > mpeg-4 to vp9. Also, aq visualization in libavfilter would suddenly be > > meaningful across codecs. Etc. > > Ah, I thought the QP API survived, but now I see that the accessors are > within FF_API_FRAME_QP as well. So this is not a bug like I thought, > but intentional, and all QP retrieval will be removed after the API > bump. Just strange that the accessors have no attribute_deprecated. I agree that's strange. We should probably add them... Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel