On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 11:14:28AM +0100, wm4 wrote: > > On a 16-bit-per-pixel output with a CPU-based decoder you will > > not find _any_ over 25% of Cinepak speed. Raw video can not compete > > either when indata delivery bandwidth si limited. > > > > It has also an unused improvement margin in the encoder, still keeping > > legacy decoders compatibility. The current encoder is already performing > > a _way_ better than the proprietary one, so why leave this nice tool > > unused where it can help? > > I can't take this seriously, but I won't go and try finding a better > codec just to make a point.
I take this as a statement that you believe something without having the actual information. [concerning get_format()] > I don't know what you're thinking, but that's just wrong. Thanks for making your point quite clear. Have a nice day, Rune _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
