On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 08:44:54PM +0100, Daniel Oberhoff wrote: > filter strictly “halves” the image efficiently, which is often exactly what > is needed > likely much faster than using scale > fully slice parallelized > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Oberhoff <dan...@danieloberhoff.de> > --- > libavfilter/Makefile | 1 + > libavfilter/allfilters.c | 1 + > libavfilter/vf_halve.c | 367 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 369 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 libavfilter/vf_halve.c
if you want to improve scaling by a specific factor, be that with a specialized implementation, threads, SIMD or other that belongs into libswscale. libswscale is the component in FFmpeg and avfilter that does that having many special cases added into libavfilter filters that could be done equally fast in libswscale is not a good idea. Also this filter would not be used when scaling by that factor unless its manually used, which means it would have very few users in practice while in swscale it would be used automatically if the case and quality settings match ... [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For even the very wise cannot see all ends. -- Gandalf
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
