On 03/03/17 01:16, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 22:00:36 +0300, Kagami Hiiragi wrote:
>> + {"row-mt", "Row based multi-threading", OFFSET(row_mt),
>> AV_OPT_TYPE_INT, {.i64 = -1}, -1, 1, VE},
> ^
> Woudn't a _BOOL type accept exactly the same ranges and defaults, with
> the same behavior, but document itself more nicely?
>
> It would result in
> -row-mt <boolean> E....... Row based multi-threading (default auto)
> instead of
> -row-mt <int> E....... Row based multi-threading (from -1 to 1)
> (default -1)
>
> (Guessing, untested.)
>
> Moritz
I copied description of "lossless" flag, but "frame-parallel" and other
encoders seems to prefer BOOL, you are right.
I'm leaving it up to commiter, it's just s/_INT/_BOOL/.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
