On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Muhammad Faiz <mfc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Muhammad Faiz <mfc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> this gives better frequency response >> >> update swresample fate and other fates >> that depend on resampling >> >> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Faiz <mfc...@gmail.com> >> --- >> libswresample/resample.c | 14 +-- >> tests/fate/libswresample.mak | 276 >> +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- >> tests/ref/acodec/roqaudio | 2 +- >> tests/ref/acodec/s302m | 6 +- >> tests/ref/lavf/dv_fmt | 8 +- >> tests/ref/lavf/gxf | 8 +- >> tests/ref/lavf/mxf | 12 +- >> 7 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 163 deletions(-) >> > > Test case, from 44100 to 705600 (16*44100) > ffmpeg -filter_complex "aevalsrc='if(n-300,0,1)', > aresample=osr=705600:filter_size=16" -f f32le - | ./freq-resp > > freq-resp.txt > > > gnuplot result attached
ping _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel