On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 03:52:06PM +0100, wm4 wrote: > On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:24:51 +0100 > Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > > > Fixes: 732/clusterfuzz-testcase-4872990070145024 > > > > See: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/6] avcodec/dca_xll: Fix runtime error: signed > > integer overflow: 2147286116 + 6298923 cannot be represented in type 'int' > > Found-by: continuous fuzzing process > > https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/tree/master/targets/ffmpeg > > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> > > --- > > libavcodec/dca_xll.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/libavcodec/dca_xll.c b/libavcodec/dca_xll.c > > index 6cebda35e4..0fe90c7348 100644 > > --- a/libavcodec/dca_xll.c > > +++ b/libavcodec/dca_xll.c > > @@ -1312,7 +1312,7 @@ static int combine_residual_frame(DCAXllDecoder *s, > > DCAXllChSet *c) > > } else { > > // No downmix scaling > > for (n = 0; n < nsamples; n++) > > - dst[n] += (src[n] + round) >> shift; > > + dst[n] += (unsigned)((src[n] + round) >> shift); > > } > > } > > > > Seems reasonable.
applied thx -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it. -- Voltaire
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel