On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 06:26:05AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 6:22 AM, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> > wrote: > > > if you say these are not bugs by definition even though its > > quite obvious they are bugs then whatever you use as definition must > > be flawed. Or you misunderstood what i wrote. > > > > That's hypocritical.
in what way ? > > Id like to apply the patch unless you or someone else objects. > > > I really don't like this approach. I'd like you to try to find something > more sensible that protects developer machines from bugs also. i suggested to decouple SUINT from the #ifdef DEBUG, which fixes exactly that possibility (and noone seemed to care) [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB He who knows, does not speak. He who speaks, does not know. -- Lao Tsu
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
