On 14 April 2017 at 05:50, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2017-04-13 9:51 GMT+02:00 Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnu...@gmail.com>: > > On 13 April 2017 at 07:13, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> 2017-04-13 4:02 GMT+02:00 Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnu...@gmail.com>: > >> > On 12 April 2017 at 23:50, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> 2017-04-13 0:26 GMT+02:00 Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnu...@gmail.com > >: > >> >> > >> >> > + /* Undo the sample reorganization going from time > >> >> > order to frequency order */ > >> >> > + if (B0 > 1) > >> >> > + celt_interleave_hadamard(f->scratch, X, > >> >> > N_B >> recombine, > >> >> > + B0<<recombine, longblocks); > >> >> > >> >> Is this the same code as in opus/celt/bands.c? > >> >> Who wrote it? > >> > > >> > This exact line is also on line 1206 of the same file for PVQ > decoding . > >> > Most of the PVQ encoder is copied from our decoder since they're very > >> > similar. This commit just copies more. > >> > >> > The reason why you can find the same string in libopus is because that > >> > decoder was cut down, modified and ported as our native decoder. > >> > >> Then I suggest you add the missing copyright notices to the decoder > >> and the encoder. > > > There's nothing to do: > >> * Copyright (c) 2012 Andrew D'Addesio > >> * Copyright (c) 2013-2014 Mozilla Corporation > >> * Copyright (c) 2017 Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnu...@gmail.com> > > > > Mozilla relicensed the decoder to LGPL when it was ported. > > Sorry, I don't understand: > You write above that FFmpeg's opus decoder is based on libopus, > this also explains the similar code I saw (above). libopus is - afaict - > copyright Xiph.Org Foundation. > I suggested to add this copyright to our codec and your answer > is that there is nothing to do but I don't see Xiph mentioned: What > am I missing? > You then continue that the code was relicensed to LGPL: How is > that related to the missing copyright notice? > > Thank you, Carl Eugen > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > Point is, I have used only code from libavcodec/opus_pvq.c from the FFmpeg project. I don't have to do anything as all credit has been given where due. If libavcodec/opus_pvq.c's license header is wrong, it's not and wasn't my problem, the code's been in libavcodec for 4 years now. You'll have to submit a separate patch if you believe that's the case. And I advise you to contact all the authors as well as libav from whom this code was merged first. As I see no technical issues not license issues I've pushed the patch. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel