On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 13:30:43 +0200 Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 06:43:07AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 6:31 AM, Michael Niedermayer > > <mich...@niedermayer.cc > > > wrote: > > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> > > > --- > > > libavcodec/avcodec.h | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/libavcodec/avcodec.h b/libavcodec/avcodec.h > > > index ee133712b5..2ac1523a36 100644 > > > --- a/libavcodec/avcodec.h > > > +++ b/libavcodec/avcodec.h > > > @@ -4960,7 +4960,7 @@ int avcodec_decode_subtitle2(AVCodecContext *avctx, > > > AVSubtitle *sub, > > > * Unlike with older APIs, the packet is always fully > > > consumed, > > > * and if it contains multiple frames (e.g. some audio > > > codecs), > > > * will require you to call avcodec_receive_frame() > > > multiple > > > - * times afterwards before you can send a new packet. > > > + * times afterwards. > > > > > > Does/did this imply single-threaded decoding? > > if you cannot send a new packet before you received the output of > the previous then the decoder has only one packet at a time and cannot > decode multiple in parallel. > > ill add above to the commit message That's not how it works. I'm against the patch. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel