On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 02:50:42 +0200
Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> Suggested-by: "Ronald S. Bultje" <rsbul...@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc>
> ---
> doc/developer.texi | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/doc/developer.texi b/doc/developer.texi
> index dbe1f5421f..a948113792 100644
> --- a/doc/developer.texi
> +++ b/doc/developer.texi
> @@ -131,6 +131,11 @@ designated struct initializers (@samp{struct s x = @{ .i
> = 17 @};});
>
> @item
> compound literals (@samp{x = (struct s) @{ 17, 23 @};}).
> +
> +@item
> +Implementation defined behavior for signed integers is assumed to match the
> +expected for Twos complement. Non representable values in integer casts are
> binary
Patch is ok, but "the expected for Twos complement" sounds a bit weird.
Maybe "expected behavior"? Also "two's complement".
> +truncated. Shift right of signed values uses sign extension.
> @end itemize
>
> These features are supported by all compilers we care about, so we will not
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
