On 8/2/17, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > Le quintidi 15 thermidor, an CCXXV, Michael Niedermayer a écrit : >> removing these elements causes command lines using them to fail >> for example: >> >> ./ffmpeg -i matrixbench_mpeg2.mpg -i lena.pnm -filter_complex >> 'overlay=10:main_h-overlay_h-10:pass' -qscale 2 -t 1 file.avi > > Oh, the shorthand notation. The order of the non-essential options has > changed in the past, including recently, and does not match the > documentation, I have always considered it undocumented and as such > unspecified. > > Moreover, with a separate object like that, keeping the order will be > impossible: options added to the filter in the future will always come > before the options in the framesync object. > > Therefore, I consider this minor break of compatibility acceptable. I > should have mentioned it, but I forgot, sorry. > > What do other think? >
We should move forward, no need to keep shorthand compatibility for those options. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
