On 8/23/17, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > Le duodi 2 fructidor, an CCXXV, Paul B Mahol a écrit : >> You completely ignored and removed other aspects of my reply. > > You still are being vague. > >> Something special, like one can control both audio and video aspect at >> once and provide same info to output. > > On the usability / convenience question, we obviously disagree. I > consider that multiplying the test source filters is a more serious > source of annoyance and confusion for the users, but it is a matter of > appreciation and you obviously disagree. For that kind of question the > normal policy would be to ask for the appreciation of other people, > especially the ones who deal with users on a regular basis, before > committing.
I was asked multiple times to implement this filter. > > As for the technical issues, there are two, and the answer must be > technical: > > This filter includes some amount of boilerplate code, which is a > maintenance burden. Please make more efforts to reduce that. In this > particular instance, I believe using the framework that Stefano designed > for test sources would reduce the boilerplate code. What framework? There is only framework for video source filter which outputs static frames. > > This filter is not bit-exact. A test source needs very strongly to be > bit-exact. There is in the code base all that is needed to make it so, > and that would make it faster as well. I could make use of sine filter code. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel