2017-10-01 20:44 GMT+02:00 Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> 2017-10-01 14:03 GMT+02:00 Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com>: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> Attached patch also support GBRP, I don't know if this is a good or >> >> bad idea. >> > >> > I would personally probably err on the side of caution, but no strong >> > opinions. If this works (I assume it does), I guess it's fine (?). >> >> Do you want me to commit (with or without GBRP)? >> >> Sorry, I really don't know if this is supposed to do something >> useful or not. >> > > vmafmotion in itself isn't very useful, but it's part of the native vmaf > filter, which will be quite useful. > > I'd suggest to commit it without GBRP support for now. I'm not against GBRP > support per se, I just don't know if the results are meaningful (since we'd > base the metric on the G channel only), so I'd rather be conservative.
Pushed without GBRP, thank you! Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel