On 11/1/17, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2017-11-01 15:42 GMT+01:00 Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com>: >> On 11/1/17, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Not creating broken webp files, see difference. > > How do you know that als-in-loas in invalid?
Because you do not claim it is valid. > >>> Iirc, the practice used to be to first implement encoders / muxers, >>> then decoders / demuxers... >> >> No, it is other way around. > > I was talking about how the practice used to be, I don't think > you can deny that... > > So what about this patch? It is flawed. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
