On 26 December 2017 at 16:35, Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/26/2017 4:10 PM, Nicolas George wrote: > > I missed that. If the proposal was similar enough to what was sent > > yesterday, then my objection does not stand, of course, sorry. > > The version on the ML then was different, and it never reached consensus at > all on wording. I object for the reasons stated in my other mail. > > - Derek > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > You didn't even bother to read the patch? Your objections have been addressed. Since your new objection is invalid, I still intent to push it. Either give a valid objection or I'm pushing tomorrow night. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
